LemuelBradhamLawsuit. Com
lemuelbradhamlawsuit. com
Lots of "8-Page Facsimile" and "Actual Text Message" from Witness of accident which kicked off personal investigation into The INFINITY PROPERTY and CASUALTY CORPORATION. Also Actual "State Trooper Police Report" of accident, which helped start The Investigation as well. The Other Guy gets the Citation. I, Lemuel Bradham, gets blamed for the Accident.... By my insurance company, Infinity Indemnity Insurance Company. The Insurance Company which never stopped sending me Monthly PREMIUM STATEMENTS, and DECLARATION PACKAGES, every 6 months. LEADER SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY designated as my CARRIER. And INFINITY INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY mailing out payment statements. Believe it or not! This Page! THIS PAGE!
(Briefly discussed!)
These are ALLEGATIONS to be proven in a COURT of LAW! Please continue reading!
As follows: NOTE! To get to my second Website which will contain the actual COMPLAINT, try it a number of ways. Try LemuelBradhamLawsuit. Com. Sometimes that works! Making the letters "higher case" as shown above. Observe at the top of page! Or you can try lemuelbradhamlawsuit. com. On your computer, phone, or digital device, once you get there, you won't have that problem again. The "problem" exist because the LAWSUIT is discussed in BOTH WEBSITES. I have to get together with NETWORK SOLUTION'S technical department, to straighten this out. You can get there (my second WEBSITE). It does exist! Thank You! And continue reading this page. The second page of my first WEBSITE. I have 2 WEBSITES which discusses the LAWSUIT. And please do not forget about the book "Bubbles From The Heart". My group and I have done a LOT of research in this area. AIDS, which is directly connected with the disease of SYPHILIS. All this talk about HIV, which has never been " properly identified" is just talk! The MEDICAL LITERATURE has never "properly" identified the direct cause of AIDS. And the people who came up with this "HIV crap" won't DEBATE anyone. And provide CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE. It has never been explained how HIV can kill cells. The main ingredient for any such existence to "kill cells" is to produce a "poison" , along with other actions. HIV has NEVER been proven to produce anything, which resembles "poison production" . This is a requirement! No data shows such action. And SYPHILIS, which is the direct cause of AIDS, this type of infection is "on the rise" again. SYPHILIS was never "fully" cured! And MEDICAL practitioners know it. We, as a world of people, are not done with AIDS, yet! Further discussions coming. But for now, let's concentrate on the LAWSUIT! Please continue to read this page of my FIRST WEBSITE. The SECOND PAGE! And notice the name of the CARRIER. The CARRIER, LEADER SPECIALTY INSURANCE, has been out-of-business since 2006. And in the years of 2013-2014, a total of 19 months, they were listed as my CARRIER, illegally operating. The CORPORATE Subsidiary Of The REGISTRANT, will be posted on the first page of this WEBSITE, the first week of DECEMBER, 2017, along with the BBB REPORT which came out in 2016. A COPY of my BANK STATEMENT, confirming an ILLEGAL DEDUCTION by LEADER INSURANCE, will be on the first page as well. The DEDUCTION was for $885.86, ILLEGALLY. And it happened MULTIPLE TIMES for more than a year. This sort of action qualifies for RICO! And these DOCUMENTS don't lie. They can be confirmed. If people want to CHALLENGE the DOCUMENTS, then let's do it in Court! I'll be there! Please continue to read this page of the WEBSITE. Lots of information! The WEBSITE that you are on (another method of getting here, is by inserting lemuelbradham.com. 1st WEBSITE. . 2nd WEBSITE, lemuelbradhamlawsuit.com.) And Thank YOU! This is fresh information! Just written during the month of December 2017! The "above-mentioned information."
|
The following information was written during 2015, 2016, down to the end of the page. The entire page! Reading it will give you GREAT INFORMATION of how far the CASE has progressed. And it has progressed a LOT. The actual Police Report (State Trooper) is on this page. And also, a Text Message from one of the witnesses of the accident. It's all here. Keep reading! ******* Let's put it out there! This is a fight that
I didn't want. But it is happening. I am going after PUNITIVE DAMAGES from these institutions (whom I haven't named yet. You have no idea the companies I'm going after). I'm presenting EVIDENCE ONLY! But at the same time, if the COURT awards PUNITIVE DAMAGES, these sort of damages are based on the ASSETS and WEALTH of the particular companies (per infraction), IF and ONLY IF, they are found guilty. And also, if there is a PATH for such damages to be awarded. So, it's not just the damages incurred by the PLAINTIFF, but moreso PUNISHMENT DAMAGES decided by a JUDGE and JURY, to help deter parties from participating in such a manner, again! The EVIDENCE presented by the PLAINTIFF has to be STRONG and CONVINCING! Otherwise, no go! Follow the EVIDENCE ONLY presentations closely. I haven't named the DEFENDANTS, as of yet. Again, EVIDENCE ONLY! Keep reading.... Important DOCUMENTS follows!
|
Too Sweet IMAGE (Top of this page), under COPY RIGHT PROTECTION, 2015!
|
The following "visuals" are the "million dollar documents"
which sets up, so many things in the upcoming case.
This is one of the major reasons, why I know I'm
going to win this case! The "missing information"
which should be within the documents are just as
important as the "information" you're visualizing.
"Indisputable evidence" is what it's called.
Study the documents. And I will explain later,
as the documents works their way through the system!
|
SURPRISE! Three $1 million documents. Study them,
one by one. Very important!
Pay close attention to the APPLICANT!
And to the CARRIER!
Those are the key words! The 8 pages of FACSIMILE
represented full coverage. Or, I wouldn't be able to
drive the car off the lot. A purchase of a new vehicle!
No other paper work was submitted. One CARRIER. That
was it! And one PURCHASER. Me!
|
One of the DOCUMENTS above has a
RETRO-ACTIVE date. See if you can
"spot" the information.
|
In furtherance, and in leading to the "expiration of the policy". That should help you spot the "retro-active date". This sort of date "shuts down" any and all claims against me. Any JUDGE in America, or for the world knows this! I have a number of witnesses who has verified this date, in signed documents. Please remember that this information was sent FACSIMILE, minus my participation, once the documents were signed by the "agent and YOURS TRULY". This is what you call IRREFUTABLE EVIDENCE. Much needed! This is yet another reason why I will win the case. Evidence, Evidence, Evidence! Spot the "retro-active date". It is there!
|
One more big surprise document!
This makes four $1 million documents.
The next document contains information refuting the
accusations against me.
Follow closely! I'm explaining why I will win this case.
|
This particular document is very revealing because of
the questions asked:
The question goes as "If a vehicle is being added, answer
questions 1-3 and 8. If a driver is being added, answer
questions 4-8." The "above document" asks those
questions. Check out the document! The entire page says
what?
It says "N/A!" You see this. Right?
In other words, none of this applies!
What is left is one driver. ME!
And one "new insurance company".
Leader Specialty Insurance Company!
That's it. Nothing else applies.
This point will be explained fully in COURT!
A very important point.
Stay tuned. It gets better!
|
To be used as "evidence" only!
I haven't stated the various companies
that's within the Lawsuit. That will come later.
Evidence only! Document dated 1/30/2013 !
|
What I will tell you is that 4 insurance com-
panies ignored the documents above.
Four insurance companies ignored the police
report where a "citation" was given out. Four insurance companies never
questioned the witnesses. If they would've
done all these things, the case would've
never gotten to court. Nothing (or at least
these are the allegations, to be proven in
court), was done by the book. Very much
out- of-procedure. At this point, everything
that I'm putting forth are allegations! I will
keep you posted!
KEEP READING!
|
Keep reading! Information above was posted
4/29/2016, FRIDAY, {Keep up with the dates}
It gets very interesting all the way through.
Stick with me!
|
Florida Highway Patrol
State Trooper
Official Accident Report
(This page....)
| Text Message From "Key
Eyewitnesses"
(This page)
| Family Attorney
Patrick Gaffney
Accident observation
(This page....)
|
A $10, 365.00 payment, (listed below), without
any "subrogation effort" to follow! It should have! No effort from my insurance company!
|
My vehicle suffered $860.00 in damages.
A total of
$500.00 which came out of my pocket!
|
24 Counts of Written Intimidation, documented! I will present
at the bottom of this page, evidence of this
type of "written intimidation". I will be clear!
No "secrets" here. I have nothing to hide.
Don't you wish more people were like that?
Especially in "court cases" where honesty
really counts. COMPLAINT/ To
be filed early (2016). A lot at stake. Stay tuned!
Evidence provided, the day before the
COMPLAINT is filed. I'm excited!
Never before has this been done on line!
|
Information from the Palm Harbor Fire
Rescue (First Responders)!
Palm Harbor, Florida
|
Information posted 1/15/16 on PHF Rescue!
|
As an extra, I will post 2 documents on
the bottom of this page, which will
further express why I am so confident
that the case will be won! Both documents
will have dates/signatures.
Counsel cannot overcome all the
evidence I have against them. Law-
suit will be filed in early 2016.
Too much evidence!
Let's get started with the reading.
|
Lemuel Bradham Lawsuit.Com
(a separate Website, which will be
up and running the first week of May 2016)
The COMPLAINT (detailing exact allegations,
and a Prayer for damages) will be posted on the
Website.
"Punitive damages" are based on the various company's
assets and wealth. As Plaintiff, I have to win the case first,
before this process takes place.
One step at a time! And I want to bring you guys and
girls along with me. Every step of the way!
These various documents are "public accessible" anyway.
You didn't know this?
Now you do.
The Freedom Of Information Act makes this
possible. This is the age of "social media."
And this action. My action, should fit right in.
Shall we continue!
|
Briefly:
An accident occurred between a bicyclist and motorist (Lemuel
Bradham) on the morning of August 9, 2014. A Saturday. It
happened on Crystal Beach Avenue in Crystal Beach, Florida.
The location is between Ozona and Tarpon Springs, Florida.
A small town. There is only 2 ways in, and 2 ways out, that
I know of. I have friends over there. I live in Clearwater, about
9 miles away.
Upon leaving the small town, I approached an intersection
where bicyclists and motorists are suppose to stop. A 4-way
stop. This is the intersection, right beyond the Post Office.
In short, I (the motorist stopped) the bicyclist didn't. He
ran the "stop sign" where motorists and bicyclists (everyone)
is suppose to stop. But he didn't. In other words, he (the
bicyclist) caused the accident.
(Keep reading)....
|
There were 3 "eye witnesses" to the accident. All 3 sided with
me, in saying that the motorist (yours truly) made the
proper stop. But the bicyclist didn't stop at all. One of the
witnesses, who saw the bicyclist violate the stop sign, is a
lawyer by the name of Patrick Gaffney. A local attorney, who
just happened to be, right behind the gentleman who ran
the stop sign. Attorney Gaffney was on his bicycle. Had a
real clear view of what took place. In other words, he saw the
guy violate the stop sign. I, Lemuel Bradham, got Mr. Gaffney's
name (as you can well observe), and his cell phone number.
Thank God!
(Keep reading:)
|
The other 2 witnesses were in a vehicle on the other side
of the intersection, not too far from my vehicle.
They, Verenda Santilli and her male friend, witnessed the
accident. In short, Attorney Gaffney and Verenda Santilli
and friend, concluded that the bicyclist was at fault. No
other witnesses voiced their observation of events, to me,
or to the other witnesses. The bicyclist's wife was a mile
ahead of him, on her bicycle. She witnessed absolutely
nothing! She was a complete "nonfactor!"
I have a few more motorists who said that "they would
testify on my behalf that they have had trouble with
bicyclists not wanting to adhere to the stop signs at this
location." "Near misses!"
This is surely a "bad crossing!" So they say!
|
Open and shut case, right?
Not so fast!
|
I filed a claim with my insurance company.
And? That's right! He (the bicyclist) filed a claim
against me. You guessed it.
The Florida Highway Patrolman, a State Trooper sided with
me (per witness). The "police report" sided with me, spelling
out the exact occurrence of events. And gave the bicyclist a
"citation". And while the Trooper was writing out the report, he
saw 34 of 40 bicyclists violate the intersection. In otherwords,
34 bicyclists ran the "stop sign", right in front of the police
officer. Unbelievable!
He got out of his cruiser, "screaming at them."
Some of them stopped. While some just slowed down,
and kept going. Unbelievable! It surely could have been
another accident right in front of the officer. Some of these
people have a nerve.
The officer told me that "if he wanted to be nasty, he could
be here, all day, writing out tickets." Tickets of this sort,
involving bicycles are $106.00. I believe this is what he
told me. I didn't know this. Did you? We're all learning!
There is such a thing as "bicyclists running a stop sign."
At a 4-way stop, everyone is suppose to stop.
(Let's continue, briefly)
I will present to you a "text message" from Verenda Santilli
and myself, a week or so after the accident. It gets in-
teresting and confusing from this point. "You cannot
make this stuff up!"
|
Side Note: The officer said that "I could call him as
a witness if I desired." " He'll tell the court what he saw,
once he got there. "
|
The following "text message" conversation took place
exactly 1 week after the accident. Neither one of the
"insurance adjusters" theirs or mine, had talked to the
witnesses. The next 4 pictures are "text messages" from
my phone (which I will certainly use as evidence). I,
Lemuel Bradham, the Plaintiff (in this soon-to-be Law-
suit) texted 2 of the witnesses who observed the ac-
cident, just to see what was going on. Read the text for
yourself. It's hard to make stuff up, like the following.
I was getting feelings, that something wasn't quite right.
Read the following, and I will "shut it down" until the
Lawsuit is filed, after a little more explanation.
Read the following, off of my phone:
|
Mrs. Verenda Santilli's
response (above), to my text.
"Eye witness to the accident."
The conclusion of the text is below.
|
A "few words" to conclude
her response!
A "very important text" I might add. This was a
"game changer!"
And of course, I thanked her, as I should have.
This one "important text" changes the entire Lawsuit.
I'm glad she responded!
It was Verenda, and her "male companion" who
observed the accident. Two people in the vehicle.
Not just one!
|
Her vehicle was coming into Crystal Beach. Westbound!
The "accident" happened right in the middle of the
area where the "bicycle path" and the "major
road" intersects. The attorney, Mr. Patrick
Gaffney, a family attorney, was positioned on his
bicycle, right behind the gentleman who violated
the 4-way stop. In other words, 3 people saw this
guy, run the "stop sign." Attorney Gaffney, and this
gentleman were headed in the same direction. North!
There's no question about what happened. This
should have been a "slam dunk!"
You figure? I was leaving Crystal Beach. Eastbound!
|
Again, neither insurance company, theirs or mine
(allegedly) made contact with any of my 3 witnesses.
"Will someone please tell me, how can anyone decide
the liability of an accident, if the witnesses aren't
questioned?" "The police reports are ignored, inwhich
the other party (to the accident) receives a citation?" "And
the principal policy holder, in the accident isn't adequately
defended by his own insurance company?" Me, Lemuel
Bradham! No such defense from "day one".
|
Below are pages 2 and 3 of the Official
Police Report. The full Report will be an
exhibit within the Complaint (when) filed. The
State Trooper cites exactly what happened
(per action) within the accident.
Read the following:
|
Official Police Report, Page 2 (FHP)
|
Page 3 of the Official Police Report follows:
|
The "statement" (above), in many ways, reflect
the entire case. None of this makes sense! It's
more to the story than this. But a lot of (made-up)
stuff. Things that the other side can never prove.
Assumptions, basically. This sort of stuff shouldn't
hold up in court, before a judge and jury.
Proof is what counts. We'll see!
The "eye witness" to this accident, Mrs. Verenda
Santilli, and her companion (the 2 of them), make
tons of sense! Don't they. I'm glad they were there,
along with the other "eyewitness", Family Attorney
Patrick Gaffney. Without these 3 "eyewitnesses"
observing the bicyclist from different directions,
this case would surely be different. A lot different!
Would you agree. Witnesses are important!
|
Since 2004, I have had 7 versions of my insurance policy
with this one company. Same policy number, but different
versions, with different vehicles. Some trucks and some
cars. Paid thousands of dollars in premiums. And not one
time have I had to use the insurance until this time, back
on August 9, 2014. A total of 36 months of insurance. And
these guys (and girls) cannot even defend me in an accident
that I didn't even cause. Give me a "cold shoulder" as if
I'm some type of stranger, or something. But not when
the premiums are due. Right? "Pay the premiums."
|
I'm not mad. I'm over that! I will have to keep my
composure, if I expect to win. Which I do! Tons of written
evidence, especially with the 22 counts of intimidation,
bullying, coercion, and boycott. Each of these counts
being able to stand on it's own. This is one of the requirements.
|
The Lawsuit will contain, anywhere from 50 to 60
counts. Depending upon what we feel like will stand up
in court. As a learning experience the Lawsuit will
cost around $400.00 to file. Subpoenas and depositions
cost money as well. The "statute of limitations" comes
into play as well. The "obscenities (so-to-speak)" from the
other side didn't stop until the first to the middle of
2015, which can be proven in court. You have to get all
of the acts, accounted for, before you file the case. Or you'll
be cheating yourself.
|
For those (possibly) interested people,
Florida Statute 626.9541 (1) (d) deals with
"Unfair methods of competition and unfair
deceptive acts." Within this one section alone,
we (my legal team and I) can come up with 34
separate counts of "wrong doings". Or
shall we say, "34 alleged counts of wrong
doings." This pertains to "insurance companies."
We'll let the Court System sort this out.
It should be interesting! And worth being patient.
|
Also check out Florida Statute 626.9511, and
626.9521. All this is under Florida Unfair Claims Laws
And Regulations. The Business Of Insurance, etc.
Within Florida Statute 626.9541(1)(d), categories of
"boycott, coercion, and intimidation" are addressed.
|
We're almost there. Interesting case. Right...?
|
Think about this:
My insurance company paid this guy $10,000.00 in PIP
payments, which I do not believe he deserved. And paid
property damage for the gentleman's bicycle, which I do
not believe he deserved. This is a "no-fault state". And his
insurance company was suppose to pay for this. The bicycle
which was paid off by my insurance company totalled $365.00,
property damage. I received a check from my insurance
company (which I almost had to demand some 4 months
after they paid the other guy off) totalled $360.00, after the
$500.00 deductible. I could look at that bike and tell that
it wasn't a $1,000.00 bicycle. What happened to his de-
ductible? My insurance company paid this guy $5.00 more
for his bicycle, than they did for the repairs on my car.
None of it, my fault! There's something wrong with that!
|
The numbers below are what my insurance company
paid the individual for the accident. This is off of my
insurance policy. They can give him whatever they
want. But not off of my insurance policy, where my
renewal rates were increased more than $200.00,
which definitely affects my credit, amongst other
things, etc., etc. I certainly received damages from
this action. Insurance renews every 6 months.
My insurance company paid this guy $10,000.00 in
PIP payment, and bought him a new bicycle. Where
was his PIP? This is a "no-fault" state. Florida, that is.
My insurance company paid this gentleman $365.00
property damage. My check, which I had to demand, came
more than 3 months later. There's no excuse for this.
We'll settle it in court!
|
None of this information was communicated to
me, from my insurance company. I had to do
my own investigation. In my opinion, they were
attempting to "hide the payments" to this gentleman,
from me. This is what I'm alleging. What else could it be?
The information should've been easily accessible.
|
I've "cropped" the page below. You only see
2 payments there. They are both his. I had
received nothing to this point. This information was
dated sometime in October of 2014. I didn't get my $360.00
check, until February of 2015, after I demanded it.
I have verification of the various payoffs, within
documents secured. My payoff included. Evidence of
wrong doings galore! Or should we say, "Alleged
wrong doings!" That's better. This was intentional!
Check it out below:
|
First of all, the gentleman didn't deserve anything.
He caused the accident! The "evidence" proves that.
But at the very least, he should have covered the
"deductible" through his insurance company on the
bicycle, which should have been $500.00 . The bike
was nowhere near a $1000.00 piece of machinery.
It was an "ordinary" bike! This is what I'm alleging.
|
When an insurance company pays off the other guy's
property damage. This is a sure sign that you're ab-
sorbing the "full-liability" for the accident. All the informa-
tion that was written about (about the pay-off amount)
was never communicated to me. I had to find that out
through other sources. Outside sources. Can you believe this?
My "adjuster" never told me "when the investigation
was officially completed?" "When the opposing party
got paid off, and why?" And I almost had to (beg) or
shall I say, "demand the $360.00", after I had to
pay $500.00, to get my car fixed. Can you believe this?
I no longer have this insurance company, it's needless to
say. My insurance company (allegedly) was hiding the
payoffs, along with other (alleged) violations committed.
I was told that "I would have to sue for my deductible."
They offered no help. I would have to do it myself.
|
I, Lemuel Bradham, had not one telephone exchange, with my principal adjuster. Only 1 telephone exchange with the first adjuster. And he was asking for a "recorded statement". The "second adjuster", never a direct telephone exchange. Never! That's strange!
|
One important observation I made (one after another)
was that "the gentleman who was involved in the
accident, didn't want to go to the hospital." They al-
most had to make him go. And on his way to the
hospital, the "injured party" didn't give out any
information of their insurance company. The "space"
was left blank. (Per document secured).
The wife was riding with him. (That's
right). I've been doing my "own investigation."
About an hour after the accident, inspite of talking
to the witnesses who sided with me (I know of no
other witnesses), the wife calls me on her cell phone
wanting the name of my insurance company. We ex-
changed names, and phone numbers at the
accident scene. Her home address, home telephone number, etc.
They filed claim against me knowing that they (he) caused accident.
|
Two important developments at the "accident
scene" which I don't mind sharing with you at
the moment. Very important! And that is "if it
wasn't for the wife of the husband involved in the
accident, giving me the name of Verenda Santilli
and her cell phone number, I wouldn't have it." This
is correct. I talked to Verenda and her male companion.
But I didn't write her name down, or cell phone number.
I didn't think that I would need it. I had the lawyer's name
and cell phone number, Mr. Patrick Gaffney. He was right
behind the bicyclist. Closest to the action!
You figure.
|
So, if it wasn't for her (the wife), there wouldn't be any text
for you guys to read. Please remember that "she was a mile
ahead of her husband when the accident took place." This is
what "he (the husband) told the first responders." I was only a few
feet away from them when he made the statement.
|
The wife also gave me "her name, home address,
and home telephone number", in her hand writing.
All this information is in "her (the wife's) hand writing."
I still have that information (in her hand writing), preserved.
Along with "her hand writing of Verenda's name and cell
phone number", preserved! It's going to be difficult getting
out of this one. Isn't it!
|
When you're involved in an accident, you have to
retain all of the information. Not just some. And
make sure you take pictures! You, more than likely,
will need them.
|
The wife's cell phone number appears on my "call
log." Please remember that "she gave me her home
phone number at the accident scene." "Not her
cell phone number." She called me an hour or so, after
the accident, asking me for "my insurance company's
name." I have her "cell phone" number on my (re-
tained) call log.
|
Check out the information below:
|
Very important information below: If you will notice, there
isn't any information entered of the "couple's insurance
company."
Do you "feel me?"
|
The information comes off of a "5 page report"
secured by Sunstar Medical Staff
Transport. Most of the information was "blacked out."
But not this part. Lucky me!
Lucky me!
|
It says (in very small letters):
"no insurance information entered".
I know you "feel me, now."
It is the personnel's duty to fill out, the entire report!
I've asked several of these guys, and girls.
This information should have been secured when the
couple was riding in the emergency vehicle to the
hospital, or soon afterwards. There's no excuse, and only
one answer.
Now, we're "feeling each other."
|
These are just "hand grenades" I'm telling you about.
The more "explosive material" is within the Complaint!
I have until early to middle 2016 to file the Complaint. When
it's filed, I'll present it on a separate Website.
Let's round this out.
You guys and girls have been very attentive. I have
nothing to hide!
"Private is private!"
And
"public is public!"
I know how to separate the two, in this particular order.
|
I personally don't see how the other side can
overcome all the evidence I have against them.
But sometimes, strange things happen in the court room.
You have to keep your composure, and be ready for
"any and every thing."
And I will! That's a promise.
Legal experts have backed me, on this one.
We'll see!
|
Rounding things up:
I'm bringing multiple causes of action against my insurance
company, and theirs, and the people themselves, because
inspite of the evidence, they attempted to lay "full re-
sponsibility for the accident, in my lap, while not ap-
propriately investigating this event." Never talked to a single
one of the witnesses, ignored the police report, and at-
tempted to hide certain "important actions" from me, the
policy holder. Neither insurance company (allegedly)
talked to my witnesses. A "document" proves this!
|
Buckle Your Seat Belts:
A Series Of Causes Of Actions
on the way to Civil Conspiracy!
Breach Of Contract
Business Deception
24 counts of Boycott, Bullying, Coercion and
Intimidation (at least) (maybe more!)
Business Fraud
Intentional and/or Neligent Infliction Of
Emotional Distress
Unjust Enrichment
Double Recovery
Business Negligence
(There maybe more, before the Complaint is filed!)
|
Almost forgot to mention that after the 2nd Adjuster
requested a "followup recorded conversation with me"
via voice mail, I, Lemuel Bradham, called this gentleman
15 times, left voice mails every time (call log). And he didn't re-
turn a single phone call. Unbelievable! The only communica-
tion afterwards, was by fax. This way, he couldn't deny the
fact that I attempted to communicate with him. Up to this
point, there wasn't any communication between us, which
are surely violations of the insurance agreement. I can prove
it all. Document saved, one after another. You have to have proof!
|
I retained copy of a voice mail from my phone.
There's no denying that (he), the second adjuster
asked for "the followup recorded conversation."
And proceeded, "not to followup on it."
He (the second adjuster) initiated this action.
Not me! On the same day, at 4:14 pm, on
August 15, 2014, he secured a "copy" of my
application, from this certain institution where
I purchased the insurance. An outlet. I have
written documentation of "who called", "when
the call was made, time and date", and "what
was requested". Documented proof! All
this information will come out in court.
He (the 2nd adjuster) didn't make 1 attempt
to call me, during the entire process.
Documented! (Per call log)! Ever!
|
In conclusion, my Prayer For Relief starts
at $10 million plus punitive damages...,
plus a few more. Punitive damages are based on the
company's assets and wealth. It's a different scenario, as if you were
suing individuals (so to speak). It gets complicated. But
you can figure it out, with the right legal advice.
Check out the Website once it's up, the first week
of March, 2016.
Lemuel Bradham Lawsuit. com
And "Happy New Year!"
|
Every meeting which requires "court presence".
Every legal document filed. I will keep the public
informed. This will be a "learning experience"
for people who are interested in this sort of stuff. It can
get complicated.
"Every man and woman, for his/herself." And "God
Almighty for us all!"
Can we at least unite, once, for mankind's goodwill
for that which was created. And for that which was
intended to be.
"Fair play!"
|
I keep that which is "personal, personal."
That which is "private, private." And that
which is "public accessible, public!" In that
order.
Can you believe that I call myself, a "Loner".
I am most comfortable, when I'm by myself.
No stress, no drama! Just me. They tell me that
my dad was like that, always drifting off by
himself.
It's refreshing sometimes.
Isn't it.
|
|