SAMANTHA W. DEDICATION

Alison "ALI" Gertz

Lemuel, LieDetectorTime

BillionDollarLAWSUIT

2nd Lawsuit

Bubbles FromThe Heart!

PROFORMATIVE!

PROFORMATIVE! 2 Examples

Proof of SYPHILIS, CAUSE!

SCHEDULE, for COMPLETION

Too Sweet Enterprises

LemuelBradhamLawsuit!

Nuggets Of SCAM & COVERUP

JustNameChange????

No DBA RegistrationLEADER

EVIDENCE PRESENTED!

SCOOP on Leaderspecialty!

8 PageFacsimileImportant!

BankStatementDeductions

2006InfinityRegistrant

BetterBusinessBReport!!!!

Putting To Rest ALIASES

SCAM! Documents EXPLAINED

Is It a "Trick" or "Treat

The DISSOLVEMENT PROCESS

LEADER/OHIO LAW!

LEADER/FLORIDA LAW

Working

Conclusion,SUIT!

PossibleProSe!

Lawsuit Information!

Relationships!

Bradham's 5 Laws!

Bradham's 1st Law

Bradham's 2nd Law

Bradham's 3rd Law

Bradham's 4th, 5th Laws

"Common Rule Of Law"

The P Sweetie Revolution!

The"Too Sweet" Trademark!

Home Of Book

New York Times 1988-91

AIDS Landscape, 1984

Doctor Of Divinity Degree

Attack on HIV Capability!

Proof Of Syphilis Connect

Treating AIDS/Syphilis

What Formed AIDS Disease?

Major Questions About HIV

Stating My Case!

Theorized, For Sure!

Exponential Comparisons!

HIV Infection Rate!

"Nondrug Formulas"!

Methodology Of Cure!

What's Lem Bradham About?

Friends&FormerGirls

Tribute To The Coach!

16 Member Board Advisors

The Journey, Lem Bradham

Prep School/And Parents!

Prophecy Of My Teacher!

Outstanding Teenagers!

Table Of Contents

Order Instructions!

Contact Information!

Too Sweet Enterprises/Bubbles From The Heart

Your Web Site's Slogan

 

Exponential Comparisons Of

Syphilis/AIDS during

the latter 1970's and early

1980's!

 

 

When AIDS Was Festering!


 

We are well aware that it may take sometime for

individuals to accept the news that it is syphilis

which is the ultimate cause of AIDS, rather than

HIV. But this is o'kay. When the Principles Of

Relativity were introduced by Albert Einstein, it

took 2 years for people to start to accept them.

This is certainly a lot better than what Nicolas

Corpernicus had to go through in toppling

Claudius Ptolemy's theory of the "earth being

the center of our solar system." "The Corper-

nican System placed the sun at the center."

It took nearly 1300 years to even formally

announce such a thing, and more time

for people to accept it. It was an outright

struggle to change people once they've

been indoctrinated to think a certain way.

 

We'll be glad to accept 2 years, if people will

finally come around.


 

The important thought to remember is when syphilis cases

were on a decline during this time,  "this is when

AIDS was being formally announced." "The creation of

AIDS disease," or at least this is what was being

summoned as the starting point. We think that "it

is very possible that what was being called AIDS

was headed our way, a long time before then."

 Time period of the invitation of AIDS. It was 1981.

The first mention of AIDS, formally.

Never-the-less AIDS cases were on the rise.

 

Remember the "missing cases of syphilis" I told

you about? Well, keep this thought in mind.

"How is it possible that AIDS cases be increasing,

while syphilis cases be on an abrupt decline, when

both diseases are transmitted the same?" "Through

sexual contact, and through the blood?" This surely

doesn't make sense!

 

If AIDS cases were on a sharp increase, then syphilis

cases should've done the same. Especially if the

disease of syphilis has nothing to do with AIDS at all.

"To stand alone," as the talking heads want you to

believe. That syphilis is its own disease, and nothing

more. This surely doesn't make sense.

Some of the medical practitioners were only getting

1 or 2 cases of syphilis per year. In the big cities.

This trend went on for several years. In cities such

as New York, and states like California. Numbers

which were very abnormal. In the meantime, 

here comes a multitude of AIDS cases, steam

rolling itself into medical history.

 

Do you see my point? Both should've been increasing.

The same manner of transfer. Through sexual contact

and through blood transfer.

 

This is the "exponential factor" I'm talking about.

 

If one didn't have anything to do with the other, being

that both are transmitted in the same manner (through

sex and by blood transfer), they both should've been

on the increase. Not just one, if they are independant

of each other.

 

Do you see my point once again?

 

Consider another important observation: 

Some of the drugs used on syphilis (antibiotics, etc.,)

were used on some of the AIDS patients and the dis-

ease went away. Kaposi sarcoma was one such dis-

sease. This was when the disease was being formally

treated as the AIDS classification suggested. They

were using antibiotics which worked. I think that

"the disease, just hadn't picked up sufficient speed

in the early years. Once the disease got to rolling, 

the antibiotics no longer worked."

Just a matter of picking up speed!

But an attempt to separate the 2 diseases,

that of syphilis and AIDS. How do you figure?

Especially, when syphilis shows up, anyway.

The facts are that 70 to 75% of AIDS patients

eventually show signs of syphilis.

Either before they get full-blown AIDS, or 

shortly afterwards.

 

How do you figure?

"Exponentially speaking," that is?

It just doesn't make sense.


 
 

Website:  A Continuous Work In Progress!

Stay Tuned!